List
Facebook Twitter Reddit Tumblr Email

I’ve been intensively studying the literature on how technology changes society. My focus has been on technologies much more simple and less ubiquitous than current communications and information technologies. This is primarily to understand technological change in its essence. Lately I’ve read a few things that have inspired some thoughts that I’d like to share.

The first came when reading a colleagues paper that cited John Suler’s studies on what he calls “the Online Disinhibition Effect.”

The Online Disinhibition Effect displays in the following ways:

  • You Don’t Know Me (dissociative anonymity)
  • You Can’t See Me (invisibility)
  • See You Later (asynchronicity)
  • It’s All in My Head (solipsistic introjection)
  • It’s Just a Game (dissociative imagination)
  • We’re Equals (minimizing authority)

Suler explains, “the disinhibition effect may not be so benign. Out spills rude language and harsh criticisms, anger, hatred, even threats. Or people explore the dark underworld of the internet, places of pornography and violence, places they would never visit in the real world. We might call this toxic disinhibition.”

You can read more about the Online Disinhibition Effect at Suler’s site, here.

I also just started reading Jaron Lanier’s new book You Are Not A Gadget. The first chapter outlines some of the recent changes in internet technologies and programs that encourage anonymity and the social problems this can cause.

In this book, Lanier writes:

If you feel fine using the tools you use, who am I to tell you that there is something wrong with what you are doing? But consider these points:

  • Emphasizing the crowd means deemphasizing individual humans in the design of socitey, and when you ask people not to be people, they revert to bad moblike behaviors. This leads not only to empowered trolls, but to a generally unfriendly and unconstructive online world. […]
  • Pop culture has entered into a nostalgic malaise. Online culture is dominated by trivial mashups of the culture that existed before the onset of mashups, and by fandom responding to the dwindling outposts of centralized mass media. It is a culture of reaction without action.
  • Spirituality is committing suicide. Consciousness is attempting to will itself out of existence.

(Lanier 2010: pp. 19-20, emphasis added)

So what can we do? Lanier suggests “some of the things you can do to be a person instead of a source of fragments to be exploited by other.”

  • Don’t post anonymously unless you really might be in danger.
  • If you put effort into Wikipedia articles, put even more effort into using your personal voice and expression outside of the wiki to help attract people who don’t yet realize that they are interested in the topics you contribute to.
  • Create a website that expresses something about who you are that won’t fit into the template available to you on a social networking site.
  • Post a video once in a while that took you one hundred times more time to create than it takes to view.
  • Write a blog post that took weeks of reflection before you heard the inner voice that needed to come out.
  • If you are twittering, innovate in order to find a way to describe your internal state instead of trivial external events, to avoid the creeping danger of believing that objectively described events define you, as they would define a machine.

(Lanier 2010: 21)

Sherry Turkle’s The Second Self identified long before the wide public availability of the internet that just interacting with computers has created a fragmented or separated identity – a ‘second self.’ The comments from Suler and Lanier have implications which extend far beyond their subject matter. It is a social fact that technologies change culture, social relations and the people who use them. It is also a fact that intended and unintended design elements of a technology confine – and dictate – these relationships. I post this blog not to share my own thoughts on these matters but to inspire its readers to deeply ponder these implications, to think about the technologies you use, and how this effects you, your family, your community, and the world you live in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  Posts

1 2 3 4 7
June 21st, 2014

US Policing and the State

In this blog, I synthesize multiple theories in order to produce an approach to policing sufficient to understanding police violence […]

February 20th, 2014

Troy Police Under Investigation for Pattern of Civil Rights Violations

A January 25, 2014, police riot in a bar in Troy, NY, was documented on video by numerous indoor security […]

February 13th, 2014

A Categorical Denial of Public Oversight of Police

Certifying Brutality In the weeks since Roshawon Donley and others were brutally beaten by Troy Police officers, Troy city and […]

January 29th, 2014

Video Footage Documents Police Brutality in Troy, New York

The videos below show a half hour of security camera [edit: and civilian cell phone camera] footage documenting the manufacturing […]

January 13th, 2014

Transparency, Accountability, Legitimacy

Perhaps, rather than a linear and causal relationship between transparency and accountability, these function more autonomously or the relationship is instead […]

January 13th, 2014

CFP: The Police and Theory of the State

Call for Papers: The Police and the Theory of the State Deadline: 28.02.2014 The editors of Theoria invite contributors to interrogate contemporary political […]

January 8th, 2014

Call for submissions on Critical Technology Studies

The following call for papers has just been released: Minority Report: The Rise and Fall of Critical Technology Studies Open […]

January 7th, 2014

If the WTO protesters were right, why didn’t they win?

Yesterday, The Atlantic published an article that declared “Seattle’s 1999 Protesters Were Right.” Author Noah Smith correctly explained that they […]

January 3rd, 2014

Raising the minimum wage: What does it mean to be “lifted out of poverty”?

In the present economic environment, “lifting 5 million out of poverty” will bloat what Newman and Chen call the “missing class,” those […]

January 1st, 2014

The Visibility of Police Violence as Transparency

I’ve been studying surveillance rather intensively for the past four years, and policing for a little less time. But my […]